Legal Opinion
Grandits v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided June 23, 2005No. Nos. 96-480C, 96-4801CPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HORN, Judge.
BACKGROUND
The former captions for this ease were Lawrence Abramson, et al. v. United States, No. 96-480C and John Agbayani, et al. v. United States, No. 96-4801. Both Mr. Abramson and Mr. Agbayani have settled their claims against the government. Therefore, the parties proposed and the court adopted the new caption shown above, John H. Grandits, et al. v. United States, 96-480C, 96-4801C. The parties also proposed Mr. Grandits as a representative plaintiff to assist towards the resolution of the numerous pending overtime claims by multiple plaintiffs, filed pursuant to the…
2Cases cited76 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- DiFilippo v. Barclays Capital, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- Miller v. ClintonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Adams v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- Abbey v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Abbey v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.