Legal Opinion
Bailey v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided March 13, 2002No. 00-93CPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WILSON, Judge.
Plaintiff employees allege in this action that their employer, the Army Corps of Engineers (the Corps), violated the Federal Travel Regulation, 41 C.F.R. pts. 300-304 (2000), by failing to reimburse certain travel expenses. This matter is before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to RCFC 12(b)(1).
The major issue presented is whether an amendment to the Civil Service Reform Act (CSRA), 5 U.S.C. § 7121(a)(1) (2000), making negotiated grievance procedures the *107“exclusive administrative procedure” for resolving…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Kawaauhau v. GeigerSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Food & Drug Administration v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- McCarthy v. MadiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Robert O. Mudge v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Global Computer Enterprises, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Alexander v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
- Asociacion De Empleados Del Area Canalera (Asedac) v. Panama Canal CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
- Asociacion De Empleados Del Area Canalera v. Panama Canal CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.