Legal Opinion

O'Connor v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided August 24, 2001No. 00-343CPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MILLER, Judge.

This case is before the court after argument on defendant’s motion to dismiss in part, or in the alternative, motion for partial summary judgment.1 The issues to be decided are 1) whether the terms of certain federal employees’ collective bargaining agreement foreclose them from pursuing their overtime claims in court, and 2) whether a settlement agreement between the Government and the union representing certain of these employees constitutes an accord and satisfaction of their overtime claims, such that they cannot pursue the claims in court.

*287FACTS

The following facts are…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  5. Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Robert O. Mudge v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
  2. Bailey v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
  3. O'Conner v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
  4. Ahrens v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
  5. Alexander v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API