Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Abbott v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided August 9, 2000No. 94-424 CPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

HEWITT, Judge.

Plaintiffs1 filed their Complaint in this matter on July 1, 1994, seeking monetary damages in the form of back pay and interest for alleged violations of federal law that would entitle plaintiffs to hazardous duty pay for law enforcement activities they perform as employees of the United States Immigration and Naturalization Service, United States Border Patrol (INS). Defendant filed its Answer on October 31,1994.

On April 3, 1995, defendant filed a motion to dismiss the complaint (D’s Mot.) under Rules of the Court of Federal Claims (RCFC) 12(b)(1) and (4).…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
  4. Armour & Co. v. WantockSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  5. Miree v. DeKalb CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1977

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Matthews v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
  2. Robert O. Mudge v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
  3. Bailey v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
  4. O'Connor v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
  5. Adair v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API