Legal Opinion

Dahlke v. Roeder

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 31, 1961PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHallows, J.

The appellant raises several issues involving the admission and exclusion of evidence, the instructions, the rebuttal argument, and the proration of damages between the two insurance policies, but the more-important and decisive issue is whether there is evidence to sustain the verdict that June Roeder had permission to use the car at the time of the accident so as to become an additional insured under the omnibus clause of the Mutual Service policy. The policy defines “insured” to include “any other person using such automobile, provided the actual use thereof is with the permission of the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Olson v. Milwaukee Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Behringer v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Schimke v. Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. of HermanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Bro v. Standard Accident Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Brochu v. TaylorWisconsin Supreme Court · 1936

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Derusha v. Iowa National Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Oaks v. American Family Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1995
  3. Dull v. CurranWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Krebsbach v. MillerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Krebsbach v. MillerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API