Brochu v. Taylor
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtNelson, J.
The Insurance Company contends that the court erred in denying its motions: (1) To direct the verdicts in its favor; and (2) to change the answer of the jury to question No. 11 from “Yes” to “No,” and for judgment in its favor upon the verdict as so changed.
The sole question requiring determination is whether the evidence adduced upon the trial supports the finding of the jury that at the time of the collision Lester LaTourneau was using the Rand automobile with the permission of Mr. Rand or with the permission of an adult member of his family. The question to be determined requires a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Tomasetti v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
- Kazdan v. SteinOhio Supreme Court · 1928
- Christiansen v. Ætna Casualty & Surety Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
- Kazdan v. SteinOhio Court of Appeals · 1927
- Bushman v. TomekWisconsin Supreme Court · 1936
3Cited by16 opinions
- Rakestraw v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1961
- Alabama Farm Bureau Mutual Casualty Insurance v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1959
- United Services Automobile Ass'n v. Preferred Acc. Ins. Co. Of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1951
- Hooper v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. BrannCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1944
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.