Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Krebsbach v. Miller

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 1963Published

1ConcurrenceHallows, J.

I concur in the affirmance of the order of the circuit court but disagree with the reasons given by the majority for the affirmance.

In a summary-judgment case, this court is not to decide the facts or to draw inferences therefrom except such as can be done as a matter of law. Voysey v. Labisky (1960), 10 Wis. (2d) 274, 103 N. W. (2d) 9. The trial court denied the motion for summary judgment on the ground there was a question of fact to be determined.

The majority of the court concludes that in the absence of an express prohibition against permitting others to drive the automobile the fact that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Voysey v. LabiskyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Harper v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Locke v. General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Dahlke v. RoederWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API