Legal Opinion

Dull v. Curran

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1962PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHallows, J.

Since the pleadings raise an issue of the ownership of the automobile and of Curran’s permission, the affidavits offered in support of the motion must be sufficient per se to prove the facts constituting the defense and to overcome the affidavit in opposition to the motion. The proposition of law advanced by Iowa National that retention of the registration certificate by Meese did not invalidate the sale under the Iowa Uniform Sales Act is not reached until it is first determined no genuine material issue of fact exists. Whether there was a conditional sale of the automobile to Kuhse with…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Voysey v. LabiskyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Prime Manufacturing Co. v. A. F. Gallun & Sons Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Stevenson v. BarwineckWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
  4. McChain v. City of Fond Du LacWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Schau v. MorganWisconsin Supreme Court · 1942

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lathan v. Journal Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API