Goodwin v. City of Kansas City
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Herd, J.:
This is an appeal by the City of Kansas City, Kansas, from the trial court’s finding that the City had taken plaintiffs Goodwins’ property without due process of law in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution, and from the award of damages therefrom.
In 1983 James and Stasia Goodwin purchased two contiguous tracts of residentially zoned land north of K-32 highway, within the city limits of Kansas City. The land was purchased for the purpose of supplying fill dirt for construction.
Before purchasing the land, James…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Building Inspector of Lancaster v. SandersonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
- Stoldt v. City of TorontoSupreme Court of Kansas · 1984
- Snyder v. Waukesha County Zoning Board of AdjustmentWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
- West v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Whitehead Oil Co. v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
- Dickerson v. Kansas Department of RevenueSupreme Court of Kansas · 1993
- Crumbaker v. Hunt Midwest Mining, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2003
- Rotter v. Coconino CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1991
- McPherson Landfill, Inc. v. Board of Shawnee County Comm'rsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2002
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.