Legal Opinion

Goodwin v. City of Kansas City

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 9, 1988No. 60,675PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Herd, J.:

This is an appeal by the City of Kansas City, Kansas, from the trial court’s finding that the City had taken plaintiffs Goodwins’ property without due process of law in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution, and from the award of damages therefrom.

In 1983 James and Stasia Goodwin purchased two contiguous tracts of residentially zoned land north of K-32 highway, within the city limits of Kansas City. The land was purchased for the purpose of supplying fill dirt for construction.

Before purchasing the land, James…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Building Inspector of Lancaster v. SandersonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  3. Stoldt v. City of TorontoSupreme Court of Kansas · 1984
  4. Snyder v. Waukesha County Zoning Board of AdjustmentWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  5. West v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Whitehead Oil Co. v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Dickerson v. Kansas Department of RevenueSupreme Court of Kansas · 1993
  3. Crumbaker v. Hunt Midwest Mining, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2003
  4. Rotter v. Coconino CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1991
  5. McPherson Landfill, Inc. v. Board of Shawnee County Comm'rsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2002

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API