Legal Opinion

Snyder v. Waukesha County Zoning Board of Adjustment

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 1976No. 75-185PublishedCited by 74 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHanley, J.

The sole issue presented on these appeals is whether the board of adjustment properly exercised its administrative discretion in denying appellant’s applications for variance.

Appellant seeks a variance from the ordinance enacted pursuant to sec. 59.971, Stats. Under sec. 59.99(7) (c), Stats., the county board of adjustment is empowered

“[t]o authorize upon appeal in specific cases such variance from the terms of the ordinance as will not be contrary to the public interest, where, owing to special conditions, a literal enforcement of the provisions of the ordinance will result in unnecessary…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Matter of Otto v. SteinhilberNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
  2. State Ex Rel. DeLuca v. Common CouncilWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Transport Oil, Inc. v. CummingsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
  4. State Ex Rel. Morehouse v. HuntWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Brown v. BeucMissouri Court of Appeals · 1964

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by74 opinions

  1. Willow Creek Ranch, L.L.C. v. Town of ShelbyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State v. Outagamie County Board of AdjustmentWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
  3. James N. Barbian and Joan L. Barbian v. Constantine Panagis and the City of MilwaukeeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
  4. Ottman v. Town of PrimroseWisconsin Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Marris v. City of CedarburgWisconsin Supreme Court · 1993

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API