Legal Opinion
Stoldt v. City of Toronto
Supreme Court of Kansas
Decided February 18, 1984No. 55,551PublishedCited by 86 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
234 Kan. 957 (1984)
678 P.2d 153
FRED STOLDT, Appellant,
v.
CITY OF TORONTO, KANSAS, et al., Appellees.
No. 55,551
Supreme Court of Kansas.
Opinion filed February 18, 1984.
David H.M. Gray, of Gragert, Hiebert & Gray, of Wichita, argued the cause and was on the brief for the appellant.
Dale L. Pohl, of Forbes & Pohl, of Eureka, argued the cause and was on the brief for appellees City of Toronto, Kansas, Jim Snavely, and Bill Gulick.
Patrick L. Dougherty, of Wichita, argued the cause and was on the brief for appellee Dalene Krkosska.
The opinion of the court was delivered by
HERD, J.:
This is an action by…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Bishop v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Leek v. TheisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1975
- Donald Weathers v. West Yuma County School District R--J--1Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1976
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by86 opinions
- Pepsi-Cola Bottling Co. of Pittsburg, Inc. v. Pepsico, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- James R. Farthing v. City of Shawnee, KansasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- In Re: Orthopedic Bone Screw Products Liability Litigation Legal Committee, at 98-1762 American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, North American Spine Society, and Scoliosis Research Society (The Medical Associations), at 98-1829Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- Fred T. McKibben v. Janet A. Chubb, and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner and Smith, Inc., Leland Morris, Jr., and Virginia MorrisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- State Ex Rel. Mays v. RidenhourSupreme Court of Kansas · 1991
81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.