Legal Opinion

Crumbaker v. Hunt Midwest Mining, Inc.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 30, 2003No. 88,623PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Nuss, J.:

Mark Crumbaker and other landowners filed a declaratory judgment action seeking to invalidate the land use provisions in an Annexation Agreement (Agreement) between (1) the City of De Soto (City) on the one side and (2) Hunt Midwest Mining, Inc. (3) Hunt Midwest Real Estate Development, Inc., and (4) the Estate of Harry Darby (sometimes collectively referred to as Hunt Midwest) on the other side. The controversy centers on the Agreement provisions that allowed Hunt Midwest to maintain and actually expand its Johnson County quarry operations…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Ware v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
  2. Claflin v. WalshSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
  3. Meegan v. Village of Tinley ParkIllinois Supreme Court · 1972
  4. City of Lenexa v. City of OlatheSupreme Court of Kansas · 1983
  5. County of Du Page v. Elmhurst-Chicago Stone Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1960

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Genesis Health Club, Inc. v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008
  2. Seherr-thoss v. Teton County Board of County CommissionersWyoming Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Ready Mix, USA, LLC v. Jefferson County, TennesseeTennessee Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Stueckemann v. City of BasehorSupreme Court of Kansas · 2015
  5. Zimmerman v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 2011

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API