Legal Opinion

Dickerson v. Kansas Department of Revenue

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 12, 1993No. 67,693PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Six, J.:

The central issue in this appeal is whether, under the unique facts of this case, a plea bargain in a criminal drug case collaterally estops a drug tax proceeding commenced by the Kansas Department of Revenue (KDR). Ancillary questions relating to exhaustion of administrative remedies, jurisdiction of the district court in the instant action, and the interpretation of our summary judgment Rule 141(b) (1992 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 124) are also considered.

KDR appeals the district court’s decision enjoining the collection of a tax assessment and fine…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Gillespie v. SeymourSupreme Court of Kansas · 1991
  3. Slaymaker v. Westgate State BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1987
  4. Ruebke v. Globe Communications Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1987
  5. Zarda v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 1992

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Bonin v. VannamanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1996
  2. State v. JamesSupreme Court of Kansas · 2003
  3. State v. JacquesSupreme Court of Kansas · 2000
  4. State v. MertzSupreme Court of Kansas · 1995
  5. Bomhoff v. Nelnet Loan Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2005

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API