Legal Opinion
Liebovich v. Shahrokhkhany
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 15, 1997No. B102884PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
TURNER, P. J.
Introduction
Kamyar Shahrokhkhany (defendant) appeals from the judgment in favor of his landlord, Ted Liebovich, as trustee of the Liebovich 1984 Trust (plaintiff), in this unlawful detainer action. Defendant operated a newsstand on property leased from plaintiff. He was served with a three-day notice to pay rent or quit by certified mail. Defendant denied he ever received the notice. We conclude as follows: There was no substantial evidence defendant was properly served; Code of Civil Procedure 1 section 1162 does not authorize service of a three-day notice to pay rent or…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Shearman v. JorgensenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Jordan v. TalbotCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Heinlen v. HeilbronCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Colyear v. TobrinerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Reynolds v. FraysherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Losornio v. MottaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Borsuk v. Appellate Division of Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- Palm Property Investments, LLC v. YadegarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Bank of New York Mellon v. PreciadoAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 2013
- Bank of New York Mellon v. PreciadoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.