Legal Opinion
Palm Property Investments, LLC v. Yadegar
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 3, 2011No. B224040PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DOI TODD, Acting P. J.
Plaintiff and appellant Palm Property Investments, LLC, appeals from a judgment entered in favor of defendants and respondents Fereydoon (Fred), Simin, Sara, Jacob and Saghar Yadegar (sometimes collectively the Yadegars) in an unlawful detainer action. The trial court ruled that appellant failed to meet its burden to show it satisfied the service requirements of Code of Civil Procedure section 1162.1 Appellant contends that the judgment must be reversed because the trial court should not have excluded the proof of service as hearsay and should have considered the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Birkenfeld v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- ASP Properties Group, L.P. v. Fard, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2005
- Ramona Manor Convalescent Hospital v. Care EnterprisesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Kwok v. BergrenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
- Farr v. County of NevadaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- People v. QuirozCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Borsuk v. Appellate Division of Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- Kruger v. ReyesAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 2014
- Bank of New York Mellon v. PreciadoAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 2013
- 65282 Two Bunch Palms Building LLC v. Coastal Harvest II, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2023
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.