Legal Opinion
Borsuk v. Appellate Division of Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 23, 2015No. B265613PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WILLHITE, J.
We ordered transfer of this case from the Appellate Division of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 8.1008. The issue is whether the tenant in an unlawful detainer action may bring a motion to quash service of the summons on the ground that the landlord did not properly serve the three-day notice to pay rent or quit required under the Unlawful Detainer Act. (Code Civ. Proc., §§ 1159-1179a.) We conclude that the tenant may not challenge the allegedly defective service of the three-day notice via a motion to quash service of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Engebretson & Co. v. HarrisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
- Greene v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Lacrabere v. WiseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Delta Imports, Inc. v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Air MacHine Com SRL v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Global Fin. Distribs. v. Superior Court, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Van Butenschoen v. FlakerCalifornia Superior Court · 2017
- Brown v. Garcia, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Dr. Leevil, LLC v. Westlake Health Care CenterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
- Brown v. GarciaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.