Legal Opinion

Surgical Laser Technologies, Inc. v. C.R. Bard, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided April 4, 1996No. 2:94-cv-07073PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

DITTER, District Judge.

In its second amended complaint, Surgical Laser Technologies, Inc. (SLT) alleges that C.R. Bard, Inc. (Bard) wrongfully entered into contract negotiations with it in order to extract secret financial and product information. Bard then allegedly conveyed this secret information to SLT’s competitor, Trimedyne. Trimedyne also allegedly attempted to sabotage a contract between SLT and its Indian distributor in India. SLT claims that subject matter jurisdiction is based on diversity of citizenship.

Trimedyne has moved for dismissal under Fed.R.Civ.Pro.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Provident National Bank v. California Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
  3. Ralph J. Paolino v. Channel Home Centers and Air Control Industries, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
  4. Narco Avionics, Inc. v. Sportsman's Market, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1992

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Barrett v. Catacombs PressDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1999
  2. Tracinda Corp. v. DAIMLERCHRYSLER AGDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2002
  3. Santana Products, Inc. v. Bobrick Washroom EquipmentDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1998
  4. Resnick v. ManfredyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1999
  5. Lehigh Coal & Navigation Co. v. Geko-Mayo, GmbHDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1999

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API