Legal Opinion
Barrett v. Catacombs Press
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided April 12, 1999No. Civ. 99-736PublishedCited by 47 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
I. INTRODUCTION
VAN ANTWERPEN, District Judge.
Plaintiff Stephen Barrett filed this action under Pennsylvania’s defamation law, against Defendants the Catacombs Press, James R. Privitera, Alan Stang, Darlene Sherrell and CDS Network, Inc. We have jurisdiction over this diversity action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332.
Defendant Darlene Sherrell has independently moved to dismiss this suit pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(2) for lack of personal jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and conclude that for the following reasons, this court cannot exercise personal jurisdiction over…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Toys "R" Us, Inc. Geoffrey, Inc. v. Step Two, S.A. Imaginarium Net, S.LCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
- Revell v. LidovCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
- Pavlovich v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- Ent. Rent-A-Car Wage & Hour Emp. Practices Lit.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
- Molnlycke Health Care AB v. Dumex Medical Surgical Products Ltd.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1999
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.