Legal Opinion

Tracinda Corp. v. DAIMLERCHRYSLER AG

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided March 22, 2002No. CIV.A.00-993-JJF, CIV.A.00-994-JJF, CIV.A.01-004-JJFPublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FARNAN, District Judge.

Pending before the Court is a Motion To Dismiss (D.I.52) 1 filed by Defendant Hilmar Kopper. By his Motion, Defendant Kopper seeks to dismiss (1) the Complaint in Tracinda Corp. v. DaimlerChrysler AG et al., Civil Action No. 00-984-JJF (the “Tracinda Complaint”); (2) the Complaint in Glickenhaus & Co., et al. v. DaimlerChrysler AG, et al., Civil Action No. 01-004-JJF 2 (the “Glickenhaus Complaint”); and (3) the First Amended Consolidated Class Action Complaint in In re DaimlerChrysler Securities Litigation, Master Docket No. 00-993-JJF (the “Amended Class…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De GuineeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Shaffer v. HeitnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Tracinda Corp. v. Daimlerchrysler AgCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
  2. Aeroglobal Capital Management, LLC v. Cirrus Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2005
  3. In Re Royal Ahold N v. Securities & Erisa LitigationDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2004
  4. In Re Bann Co. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
  5. In Re Enron Corporation SecuritiesDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2006

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API