Legal Opinion

Santana Products, Inc. v. Bobrick Washroom Equipment

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided July 24, 1998No. 3:CV-96-1794PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

VANASKIE, District Judge.

On October 1, 1996, plaintiff Santana Products, Inc. (Santana) instituted this antitrust action against defendants Bobrick Washroom Equipment, Bobrick Corporation, The Hornyak Group, Inc., Vogel Sales Company, Sylvester & Associates, Ltd., and Fred Sylvester, alleging that the defendants had conspired to interfere with Santana’s business through the use of false advertising materials and statements. (Dkt. Entry 1.) On July 1, 1997, defendants Sylvester & Associates, Ltd. and Fred Sylvester (hereinafter collectively referred to as the Sylvesters) filed a…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Calder v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Goldlawr, Inc. v. HeimanSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Zippo Manufacturing Co. v. Zippo Dot Com, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1997

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Barrett v. Catacombs PressDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1999
  2. In Re Western States Wholesale Natural Gas Litig.District Court, D. Nevada · 2009
  3. Youming Jin v. Ministry of State SecurityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
  4. Santana Products, Inc. v. Bobrick Washroom Equipment, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2003
  5. Resnick v. ManfredyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1999

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API