Legal Opinion
Resnick v. Manfredy
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided April 29, 1999No. 2:99-cv-00022PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
JOYNER, District Judge.
Defendants have moved to dismiss this action for lack of in personam jurisdiction and for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 12(b)(2) and (6). Alternatively, they argue that venue in this district is improper and request that this matter be transferred to the Northern District of Illinois. For the reasons which follow, the motion is granted in part and denied in part.
History of the Case
Bernard Resnick is “a well-known and reputed attorney engaged in the practice of sports and entertainment law”…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Zippo Manufacturing Co. v. Zippo Dot Com, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1997
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Dagesse v. Plant Hotel N.V.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2000
- Thompson v. WagnerDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
- Wilson v. American General Finance, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
- Davlyn Manufacturing Co. v. H&M Auto Parts, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2005
- Sheldon v. KhanalDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2008
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.