Legal Opinion
Provident National Bank v. California Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided June 4, 1987No. 86-1622PublishedCited by 352 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
ROSENN, Circuit Judge.
This appeal in a diversity action between two large financial institutions, each having headquarters in opposite sections of the country, raises a not uncommon question of how much contact a modern lending institution must have within the forum state to confer in personam jurisdiction. The United States District Court held in the instant case that California Federal Savings & Loan Association (California Federal) had sufficient “continuous and systematic general business contacts” within Pennsylvania to confer personal jurisdiction over an action…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Time Share Vacation Club v. Atlantic Resorts, Ltd. And Coastal Marketing Associates, Inc. And Schuman, Martin L., JrCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by352 opinions
- Harold Pinker, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Roche Holdings Ltd. Harold PinkerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
- Marten v. GodwinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- Neogen Corporation v. Neo Gen Screening, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- Lloyd Z. Remick, Esq. v. Angel Manfredy John Manfredy Jeffrey H. Brown, Esq. Kathleen H. Klaus, Esq. D'AnconA & PflaumCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- D'Jamoos, Estate of Weingeroff v. Pilatus AircraftCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
347 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.