Legal Opinion

Paap v. Von Helmholt

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 31, 1960No. Civ. 6295PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShepard, J.

This is an action for ejectment, for damages, and to quiet title to real and personal property. Judgment was had for plaintiffs, against defendants for possession, quieting plaintiffs' title against defendants, and for the recovery by plaintiffs of defendants of the sum of $‘1,586.06 for unlawful holding. Defendants appeal from the money judgment only.

The record before us, in general substance, shows: Plaintiffs ’ first cause of action alleged, inter alia, the execution on February 3, 1954, of a written contract of sale from plaintiffs, as vendors, to defendants, as vendees, for the sale to…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Glock v. Howard & Wilson Colony Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Freedland v. GrecoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Barkis v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Barkis v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Tuso v. GreenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hunt v. SmythCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  2. United States v. Triple a MacHine Shop, Inc. Albert E. EngelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  3. K. King and G. Shuler Corp. v. KingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  4. Whittaker v. OttoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  5. First National Bank of Wray v. McGinnisColorado Court of Appeals · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API