Legal Opinion
Whittaker v. Otto
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 27, 1961No. Civ. 6400PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShepard, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment for plaintiff in an action in ejectment.
Prom the record before us it appears, in substance, that the mining claims here subject of possessory dispute, were originally patented in 1911, and recorded January 12, 1912, from the United States to The Iron Cap Copper Mining Company, a corporation, hereinafter called “Company”; that Company was incorporated in Wyoming; that said Company’s right to do business was forfeited in November 1912, in California, and in 1927 in Wyoming; that in 1944 Percy Hagerman, hereinafter called “Percy,” was a major stockholder of…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Brewer v. SimpsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- Terry v. BenderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Neet v. HolmesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Crossman v. Vivienda Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
- Swartzbaugh v. SampsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- In Re Coupon Clearing Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Zander v. Texaco, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1968
- Magnecomp Corp. v. Athene Co.California Court of Appeal · 1989
- People Ex Rel. Department Public Works v. Shasta Pipe & Supply Co.California Court of Appeal · 1968
- 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7123, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 11,695 in Re Daisy Systems Corporation and Daisy/cadnetix, Inc. Bear Stearns and Company, Inc., a Delaware Corporation Bruce M. Holland Burton J. McMurtry Carl D. Carman F. Gibson Meyers Lutz P. Henckels, Creditors-Appellees v. Daisy Systems Corp., Debtor, and Jack S. Kenney, in His Capacity as Chapter 11 Trustee for Daisy Systems Corporation and Daisy/cadnetix, Inc., Trustee-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.