Legal Opinion

Blanton v. International Minerals & Chemical Corp.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 19, 1997No. C-970115PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Painter, Presiding Judge.

Timothy Blanton, plaintiff-appellant, worked for defendant-appellee Hamilton Foundry and Machine Co. operating a “CB-22” core-making machine. 1 The machine produces cores by compressing a sand mixture with a gas. Simply stated; the CB-22 makes cores when two halves of a box-shaped mold come together. At the foundry, an employee usually operated the CB-22 in “lock-down” position, where the box’s right side was locked in a stationary position through air pressure and the box’s left side closed on it when the operator started a cycle. During lock-down, the box’s right…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Bostic v. ConnorOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Fyffe v. Jeno's, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Ruta v. Breckenridge-Remy Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Stores Realty Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Osler v. City of LorainOhio Supreme Court · 1986

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hubbard Family Trust v. TNT Land Holdings, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. Goodin v. Columbia Gas of Ohio, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. Monus v. DayOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. Proctor v. Wolber, Unpublished Decision (5-24-2002)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API