Legal Opinion

Proctor v. Wolber, Unpublished Decision (5-24-2002)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 24, 2002No. Case No. 5-01-38Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Plaintiff-Appellant, Gordon Proctor, Director of the Ohio Department of Transportation ("ODOT"), brings this appeal from a Hancock County Common Please Court judgment entered on a jury verdict in an appropriation proceeding initiated to acquire 20.703 acres of land from Defendant-Appellee, Paul Wolber, for relocation of U.S. Route 30 in Hancock County.

ODOT maintains that a party may not submit evidence of alternative property uses unless the party has a present intent to use the property for the identified purpose and has taken steps to develop the property toward that use prior to…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  2. AAAA Enterprises, Inc. v. River Place Community Urban Redevelopment Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Goldfuss v. DavidsonOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  4. State v. AllenOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Sowers v. SchaefferOhio Supreme Court · 1951

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API