Proctor v. Wolber, Unpublished Decision (5-24-2002)
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Plaintiff-Appellant, Gordon Proctor, Director of the Ohio Department of Transportation ("ODOT"), brings this appeal from a Hancock County Common Please Court judgment entered on a jury verdict in an appropriation proceeding initiated to acquire 20.703 acres of land from Defendant-Appellee, Paul Wolber, for relocation of U.S. Route 30 in Hancock County.
ODOT maintains that a party may not submit evidence of alternative property uses unless the party has a present intent to use the property for the identified purpose and has taken steps to develop the property toward that use prior to…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- AAAA Enterprises, Inc. v. River Place Community Urban Redevelopment Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1990
- Goldfuss v. DavidsonOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. AllenOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- Sowers v. SchaefferOhio Supreme Court · 1951
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.