Legal Opinion

Ruta v. Breckenridge-Remy Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 27, 1982No. 81-182PublishedCited by 246 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNorris, J.

The sole issue presented by appellants’ first proposition of law is whether, in reversing a trial court on the basis that the court should have granted a motion for a directed verdict, a court of appeals engages in weighing evidence and therefore is bound by the provision of Section 3(B)(3), Article IV of the Ohio Constitution, which prohibits reversal on the weight of the evidence of judgments resulting from a trial by jury, except by concurrence of all three judges hearing the case. Stated another way, the question is whether a motion for a directed verdict presents only a question of law,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Rohde v. FarmerOhio Supreme Court · 1970
  2. O'Day v. WebbOhio Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Hamden Lodge No. 517 v. Ohio Fuel Gas Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Wilkeson v. Erskine & Son, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Hilleary v. BromleyOhio Supreme Court · 1946

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by246 opinions

  1. Eastley v. VolkmanOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Texler v. D.O. Summers Cleaners & Shirt Laundry Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Cater v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Malone v. Courtyard by Marriott Ltd. PartnershipOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002

241 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API