Legal Opinion

Stores Realty Co. v. City of Cleveland

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 29, 1975No. 74-112PublishedCited by 222 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStern, J.

The issue presented is whether unsworn testimony is competent evidence, where the opposing party is represented by counsel who neither requests that the witness be sworn nor objects to the testimony.. The Court of Appeals relied upon this court’s per curiam opinion in Arcaro Bros. Builders v. Zoning Board of Appeals (1966), 7 Ohio St. 2d 32, 218 N. E. 2d 179. In that case, the chairman of the Zoning Board of Appeals, at an administrative hearing, “refused permission to have any of the witnesses sworn, and allowed unidentified statements, apparently from the audience attending the hearing, to…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Beausoliel v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
  2. Newcomb v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. Buck Wilcoxon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1956
  4. Snyder v. StanfordOhio Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Da Roza v. FarrellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by222 opinions

  1. Dudukovich v. Lorain Metropolitan Housing AuthorityOhio Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Galmish v. CicchiniOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  3. LeFort v. Century 21-Maitland Realty Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987
  4. State v. NicholsOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Normandy Place Associates v. BeyerOhio Supreme Court · 1982

217 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API