Osler v. City of Lorain
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCelebrezze, C.J.
This case requires us to examine and apply fundamental principles of the law of negligence. An integral part of our analysis is the basic and well-settled concept that negligence is without legal consequence unless it is a proximate cause of an injury. See, generally, Prosser & Keeton, Law of Torts (5 Ed. 1984) 272-280, Section 42.
We are first called on to determine whether there was error in the trial court’s decision to grant the city’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. A favorable ruling on such a motion is not easily obtained, as this court explained in Posin v. A.B.C.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Posin v. A. B. C. Motor Court Hotel, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1976
- Rohde v. FarmerOhio Supreme Court · 1970
- Hawkins v. IvyOhio Supreme Court · 1977
- Tighe v. DiamondOhio Supreme Court · 1948
- Jenkins v. KriegerOhio Supreme Court · 1981
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by172 opinions
- Cabe v. LunichOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- Ziegler v. Wendel Poultry Services, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1993
- Ford v. Tandy Transportation, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1993
- Blair v. McDonaghOhio Court of Appeals · 2008
- Environmental Network Corp. v. MillerOhio Supreme Court · 2008
167 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.