Legal Opinion

Fairbanks North Star Borough School District v. Bowers Office Products, Inc.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided May 5, 1993No. S-4525PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COMPTON, Justice.

This dispute arose after the Fairbanks North Star Borough School District (school district) requested proposals and awarded contracts to obtain copier services for a three year period. Bowers Office Products, Inc. (Bowers), an unsuccessful bidder, sued the school district. The superior court concluded that the school district had breached its implied promise to fairly and honestly consider Bowers’ proposal, awarded Bowers its bid preparation costs and cancelled the copier contracts. The school district appeals. We reverse.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Beginning…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Keco Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1974
  2. Tesoro Alaska Petroleum Co. v. Kenai Pipe Line Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Kelly v. ZamarelloAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Heyer Products Company v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1956
  5. Jager v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1975

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Laidlaw Transit, Inc. v. Anchorage School DistrictAlaska Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Gunderson v. University of Alaska, FairbanksAlaska Supreme Court · 1996
  3. BP Pipelines (Alaska) Inc. v. State, Department of RevenueAlaska Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Kila, Inc. v. State, Department of AdministrationAlaska Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Bowers Office Products, Inc. v. Fairbanks North Star Borough School DistrictAlaska Supreme Court · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API