Legal Opinion

Laidlaw Transit, Inc. v. Anchorage School District

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided August 12, 2005No. S-10796PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BRYNER, Chief Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Laidlaw Transit and First Student both bid on the Anchorage School District’s pupil transportation contract for 2001-2006. The district deemed both bids responsive and awarded the contract to First Student, finding the award to be in the district’s best interests. Laidlaw sued the district and First Student, seeking to overturn the award, alleging fraud, miscalculation of the value of its proposal, violation of its right to procedural due process, and other errors. The superior court converted the suit to an administrative appeal, declined to hold…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Darby v. CisnerosSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Kelly v. ZamarelloAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Moore v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Sea Lion Corp. v. Air Logistics of Alaska, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1990

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Heller v. State, Department of RevenueAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Davis Wright Tremaine LLP v. State, Department of AdministrationAlaska Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Skaskiw and Vermont Volunteer Services for Animals Humane SocietySupreme Court of Vermont · 2014
  4. Titus v. State, Dept. of Administration, Division of Motor VehiclesAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Wasser & Winters Co. v. Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers (America), Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2008

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API