Gunderson v. University of Alaska, Fairbanks
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FABE, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
This is an appeal from the decision of the superior court upholding the University of Alaska’s award of a coal hauling and unloading contract to Royal Contractors. We affirm.
II.FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS
The University of Alaska, Fairbanks (UAF or the University) generates its own power and produces heat for the campus buildings by means of a coal-burning power plant. For many years the University obtained coal for its power plant through the Alaska Railroad Corporation (ARRC), which delivered the coal in rail cars to a siding next to the power plant. This method…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Tesoro Alaska Petroleum Co. v. Kenai Pipe Line Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1987
- Earth Resources Co. of Alaska v. State, Department of RevenueAlaska Supreme Court · 1983
- King v. Alaska State Housing AuthorityAlaska Supreme Court · 1973
- Chris Berg, Inc. v. State, Department of Transportation & Public FacilitiesAlaska Supreme Court · 1984
- Cook Inlet Pipe Line Co. v. Alaska Public Utilities CommissionAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- John v. BakerAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
- City of Kenai v. Friends of the Recreation Center, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2006
- Davis Wright Tremaine LLP v. State, Department of AdministrationAlaska Supreme Court · 2014
- O'CALLAGHAN v. RueAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
- Laidlaw Transit, Inc. v. Anchorage School DistrictAlaska Supreme Court · 2005
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.