Legal Opinion

Kila, Inc. v. State, Department of Administration

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided July 8, 1994No. S-5237PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RABINOWITZ, Justice.

• This appeal arises from the Department of Corrections’ award of a contract to Allvest, Inc. for the housing of minimum security prisoners in the Fairbanks area. KILA, Inc. (“KILA”), an unsuccessful bidder, contested the award, exhausted its administrative appeals, and then appealed to the superior court. The superior court affirmed the Department of Administration’s decision denying KILA’s protest. This appeal followed.

I. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

In August 1988, the Department of Corrections (“DOC”) received authorization to seek proposals for a provider of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Keco Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1974
  2. Tesoro Alaska Petroleum Co. v. Kenai Pipe Line Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Kelly v. ZamarelloAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Jager v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Kenai Lumber Co., Inc. v. LeRescheAlaska Supreme Court · 1982

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Baxley v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Weed v. BACHNER CO. INC.Alaska Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Paul Wholesale, B.V./HOLS Trading, GmbH, J.V. v. State, Department of Transportation & Public FacilitiesAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Paul Wholesale v. STATE, DEPT. OF TRANSP.Alaska Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Paul Wholesale, B.V./HOLS Trading, GmbH, J.V. v. State, Department of Transportation & Public FacilitiesAlaska Supreme Court · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API