Bernhard v. Wall
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
The appeal is from the judgment.
The objects of the action, as expressed in the prayer of the complaint, were to obtain a decree declaring void certain state land patents issued to Bobert M. Bankin and Thomas J. Dunlap, respectively, or, in case the patents should be held legal, to declare that defendant holds title to the lands, described therein in trust for the plaintiff and that he be compelled to convey said lands to plaintiff, and for general relief. The findings are within the issues and the principal, if not the only, points urged in support of the appeal are that the findings do not…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Smelting Co. v. KempSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Shepley v. CowanSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Williamson v. BerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1850
- Hahn v. KellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
- Stoddard v. ChambersSupreme Court of the United States · 1844
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Daar v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1967
- Residents of Beverly Glen, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- Weaver v. Pasadena Tournament of Roses Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Lewis v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- People v. Rath Packing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1974
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.