Mitchell v. Titus
Supreme Court of Colorado
Appeal from the District Court of Arapahoe County: I-Ion. Frank T. Johnson, Judge.
1Opinion of the Court
Mr.. Justice Gunter
delivered the opinion of the court.
This was our code action to quiet title. Mills’ Ann. Code, sec. 255. The complaint properly omitted to set out the nature and character of the adverse claim of defendant. Such matter should be pleaded in the answer. — Amter v. Colon, 22 Colo. 150, 152; Wall v. Magnes, 17 Colo. 476, 478; Schlageter v. Gude, 30 Colo. 310; McCroskey et al. v. Mills, 32 Colo. 271.
The answer denied plaintiff’s possession and title and alleged an adverse claim under a tax deed. The replication traversed the material averments of the answer and set up matter…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Morris & Thombs v. St. Louis National BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1892
- Wall v. MagnesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1892
- Phillippi v. LeetSupreme Court of Colorado · 1893
- Schlageter v. GudeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1902
- Amter v. ConlonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1896
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Ohio Oil Co. v. Wyoming AgencyWyoming Supreme Court · 1947
- Empire Ranch & Cattle Co. v. BenderSupreme Court of Colorado · 1911
- Lambert v. MurraySupreme Court of Colorado · 1911
- Whitehead v. CallahanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1908
- Concord Corporation v. HuffSupreme Court of Colorado · 1960
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.