Legal Opinion
State v. Bahl
Washington Supreme Court
Decided October 9, 2008No. 79988-1PublishedCited by 208 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
193 P.3d 678 (2008)
STATE of Washington, Respondent,
v.
Eric G. BAHL, Petitioner.
No. 79988-1.
Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.
Argued February 28, 2008.
Decided October 9, 2008.
Andrew Peter Zinner, Nielsen, Broman & Koch, PLLC, Seattle, WA, for Petitioner.
Mary Kathleen Webber, Snohomish County Prosecutor's Office, Everett, WA, for Respondent.
MADSEN, J.
¶ 1 The defendant argues that he is entitled to bring a preenforcement vagueness challenge to conditions of community custody imposed as part of his sentence. We agree and hold that several of the conditions are unconstitutionally vague. We…
2Cases cited75 opinions
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by208 opinions
- State v. BlazinaWashington Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. ValenciaWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. ValenciaWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- TracFone Wireless, Inc. v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. Hai Minh NguyenWashington Supreme Court · 2018
203 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.