Grannis v. Ordean
Supreme Court of the United States
ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. The facts, which involve the validity under the due process provision of the Fourteenth Amendment of a judgment based on service by publication in which the name of the defendant was misspelled, are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Pitney
These two cases were heard as one, upon the record in No. 325; it being stipulated that since the cases are identical in their facts, and in the questions raised, except that they pertain to different portions of the land respecting which the controversy arises, the decision in No. 326 shall abide the result in No.- 325. We shall, therefore, discuss the record in the latter case, without further mention of No. 326.
On the eighth day of November, 1895, and for some time prior thereto, one John McKinley was the owner of an undivided .fifth part of certain lands in the County of St. Louis, in'…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Windsor v. McVeighSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Galpin v. PageSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- The Lafayette Ins. Co. v. FRENCHSupreme Court of the United States · 1856
- Roller v. HollySupreme Court of the United States · 1900
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by697 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
692 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.