Legal Opinion
Bossuk v. Steinberg
New York Court of Appeals
Decided February 17, 1983PublishedCited by 104 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs, and the question certified answered in the affirmative.
*918CPLR 308 (subd 2) provides for delivery to “a person of suitable age and discretion” (other than the person to be served), while subdivision 1 provides for delivery to “the person to be served”. However, except for additional requirements not relevant here, the two subdivisions are identical. In particular, each subdivision provides for “delivering the summons”. Absent any indication to the contrary, therefore, we may assume that, by…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Nassau Insurance v. MurrayNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Dobkin v. ChapmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
- McDonald v. Ames Supply Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1968
- Levine v. National Transportation Co.New York Supreme Court · 1953
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by104 opinions
- Meckel v. Continental Resources Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Wichert v. CardwellWashington Supreme Court · 1991
- Macchia v. RussoNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Bankers Trust Co. of California, N.A. v. TsoukasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Raschel v. RishNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
99 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.