Legal Opinion

Bennett v. Hardy

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 18, 1990No. 56118-4PublishedCited by 231 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrachtenbach, J.

Plaintiffs allege age discrimination by their employer but cannot bring a cause of action against him under RCW 49.60, the state Law Against Discrimination, because he employs fewer than eight employees and thus is not within that statute's definition of employer. The issue presented is whether we should imply a cause of action under a separate statute, RCW 49.44.090, which makes age discrimination an unfair employment practice but does not create a remedy.

Two plaintiffs sued their former employer and his wife 1 alleging age discrimination and wrongful discharge. The trial court granted…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Frank L. LOEB, Plaintiff, v. TEXTRON, INC., Et Al., DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1979
  4. Thompson v. St. Regis Paper CompanyWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Dicomes v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1989

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by231 opinions

  1. State v. FordWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Collins v. RizkanaOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Wilmot v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Gardner v. Loomis Armored, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Hanson v. City of SnohomishWashington Supreme Court · 1993

226 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API