Legal Opinion

Anderson Producing Inc. v. Koch Oil Co.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided October 18, 1996No. 94-1198PublishedCited by 105 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Subject to certain exceptions, Texas Disciplinary Rule of Professional Conduct 3.08 prohibits an attorney from representing a party in an adjudicatory proceeding if the attorney knows or believes that he or she may be a witness at trial. Tex.Disciplinary R.PROF.Conduct 3.08 (1994), reprinted in Tex.Gov’t Code Ann., tit. 2, subtit. G app. (Vernon Supp.1996). Relying solely on this rule, respondent persuaded the court of appeals to reverse the trial court’s judgment for petitioner because the lawyer who represented petitioner during pretrial proceedings later testified as an expert and fact…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Spears v. Fourth Court of AppealsTexas Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Ayres v. CanalesTexas Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Mauze v. CurryTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Koch Oil Co. v. Anderson Producing, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)1994

3Cited by105 opinions

  1. In Re Cerberus Capital Management, L.P.Texas Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Gonzalez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2003
  3. In Re SandersTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  4. In Re MeadorTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Marin Real Estate Partners, L.P. v. VogtCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2011

100 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API