Legal Opinion

In Re Meador

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 3, 1998No. 97-0582PublishedCited by 110 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPhillips, Chief Justice

The issue in this original mandamus proceeding is whether the trial court abused its discretion by refusing to disqualify plaintiffs counsel. Defendants contend that the lawyer improperly used privileged documents which the lawyer’s client (in another lawsuit) secretly removed from defendants’ offices. We hold that, under the facts and circumstances of this case, the trial court did not abuse its discretion by refusing to disqualify the lawyer. The court of appeals therefore abused its discretion in granting mandamus relief compelling disqualification. See 948 S.W.2d 345. Accordingly, we…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Downer v. Aquamarine Operators, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Johnson v. Fourth Court of AppealsTexas Supreme Court · 1985
  4. State Department of Highways & Public Transportation v. PayneTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Beaumont Bank, N.A. v. BullerTexas Supreme Court · 1991

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by110 opinions

  1. In Re Nitla S.A. De C.V.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
  2. In Re Department of Family & Protective ServicesTexas Supreme Court · 2009
  3. In Re SandersTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Royston, Rayzor, Vickery, & Williams, Llp v. Francisco "Frank" LopezTexas Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Powell v. StoverTexas Supreme Court · 2005

105 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API