Legal Opinion

In Re Cerberus Capital Management, L.P.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 13, 2005No. 04-0732PublishedCited by 693 opinions

1Per curiam

The issue in this original proceeding is whether the trial court abused its discretion in disqualifying the relators’ counsel based on a conflict of interest. Because the real party in interest executed a written waiver of any potential conflict of interest, we hold that the trial court abused its discretion and we therefore conditionally grant mandamus relief.

On January 26, 2001, WSNet Holdings, Inc., hired Vinson & Elkins (“V & E”) attorney Patrick Breeland to draft an asset purchase agreement for certain assets of Classic Communications, Inc. Breeland prepared an asset purchase agreement…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Johnson v. Fourth Court of AppealsTexas Supreme Court · 1985
  3. In the Interest of B.L.D.Texas Supreme Court · 2003
  4. In Re Nitla S.A. De C.V.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Spears v. Fourth Court of AppealsTexas Supreme Court · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by693 opinions

  1. In Re McAllen Medical Center, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2008
  2. In re H.E.B. Grocery Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2016
  3. In re DawsonTexas Supreme Court · 2018
  4. In Re Slavonic Mutual Fire Insurance Ass'n, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2010
  5. In Re Jacobs, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2009

688 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API