Legal Opinion

Gonzalez v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided October 8, 2003No. 561-02PublishedCited by 229 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

OPINION

2Opinion of the Court · HolcombHolcomb, J.

in which KELLER, P.J., and MEYERS, PRICE, and COCHRAN, JJ„

joined.

The Issue

Ralph Gonzalez, appellant’s counsel of choice was disqualified as counsel on the *835State’s pretrial motion. The State argued that he would be a witness necessary to establish an essential fact on behalf of appellant and that the dual roles of advocate and witness would taint the jury, resulting in actual prejudice to the State. After conviction, appellant appealed, claiming among other things, that the trial court’s ruling dismissing his attorney violated his Sixth Amendment right to counsel of his choice.

We…

3Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Wheat v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Ladd v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
  5. Chandler v. Warden FretagSupreme Court of the United States · 1954

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by229 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Young v. Sixth Judicial District Court of Appeals at TexarkanaCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
  2. Bowen v. CarnesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2011
  3. Ramon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2004
  4. Cueva v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2011
  5. Klapesky v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2008

224 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API