Legal Opinion

Ayres v. Canales

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 30, 1990No. C-9501PublishedCited by 91 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GONZALEZ, Justice.

In this original proceeding, relators seek writ of mandamus directing the trial court to withdraw its order prohibiting R. Jack Ayres, Jr., and other attorneys in his firm, R. Jack Ayres, Jr. P.C., from “verbally” participating in either the trial or pretrial depositions in a suit wherein relators are plaintiffs seeking a declaratory judgment. We hold that the trial court abused its discretion and conditionally grant the writ.

FACTS

The underlying lawsuit giving rise to this proceeding involves an alleged oral agreement regarding a referral fee. Attorney Jerry Nix, the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. West v. SolitoTexas Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Borman v. BormanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  3. NCNB Texas National Bank v. CokerTexas Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Garcia v. PeeplesTexas Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Ex Parte ShafferTexas Supreme Court · 1983

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by91 opinions

  1. Barnes v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1992
  2. In Re Nitla S.A. De C.V.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
  3. In Re Epic Holdings, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Spears v. Fourth Court of AppealsTexas Supreme Court · 1990
  5. In Re SandersTexas Supreme Court · 2004

86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API