Mauze v. Curry

In this original proceeding, Relator George W. Mauze, II seeks a writ of mandamus directing the trial judge (1) to vacate his March 2, 1993 order denying Mauze’s motion to disqualify counsel and (2) to grant Mauze’s motion to disqualify counsel. Pursuant to Rule 122 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, without hearing oral argument, a majority of the court conditionally grants the writ of mandamus.

Mauze previously represented Cleta and Sam Sample in a personal injury case which was settled for $125,000. The settlement check was made payable to the Samples and their prior attorney, Tom…