Legal Opinion
Nieszner v. St. Paul School District No. 625
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided May 14, 2002No. C5-01-1806PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*647OPINION
HALBROOKS, Judge.
Appellant challenged the results of a veteran’s preference hearing in district court, and the court dismissed the case for lack of personal jurisdiction. Appellant contends that (1) the district court erred in ruling that Minn. R. Civ. P. 4.03(e)(4) applies to service of the notice of appeal required by Minn.Stat. § 197.46 (2000); and (2) once the court dismissed his appeal, the court administrator had no legal authority to tax costs against him. Because service of the notice of appeal pursuant to section 197.46 commences a civil action and appellant did not comply…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Murphy Brothers, Inc. v. Michetti Pipe Stringing, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Benigni v. County of St. LouisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
- Bardwell v. CollinsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
- Tullis v. Federated Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Medalen v. Tiger Drylac U.S.A., Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2003
- Koski v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013
- Sykes v. City of RochesterCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
- Smith v. FlotterudCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
- HNA Properties v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.