Smith v. Flotterud
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WILLIS, Judge.
Appellant challenges the district court’s dismissal of her complaint for insufficient service of process. Because the record shows that service was not made knowingly and intentionally and because appellant did not substantially comply with rule 4 of the Minnesota Rules of Civil Procedure, we affirm.
FACTS
On September 30, 1998, appellant Denise M. Smith was involved in a motor-vehicle accident in Rochester with respondent Harold J. Flotterud. Smith attempted to serve a summons and complaint on Flotterud on April 7, 2004, when process server James Little went to what he…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Tullis v. Federated Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- Amdahl v. Stonewall Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
- State v. MaidiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Leiendecker v. Asian Women United of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007