Sykes v. City of Rochester
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SCHELLHAS, Judge.
These consolidated appeals arise out of the district court’s dismissals of pro se appellant’s special-assessment appeals as untimely. Appellant challenges the dismissals on the bases that respondent did not properly notify her of the special-assessment hearings before the city council, and that she timely served and filed her appeals in the district court. Because we conclude that respondent did not provide appellant proper notice of the special-assessment hearings and that the proposed assessments therefore were never adopted, we reverse and set aside the purported…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Star Centers, Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- Klapmeier v. Town of Center of Crow Wing CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Andrusick v. City of Apple ValleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Shortridge v. DaubneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Nieszner v. St. Paul School District No. 625Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- DRB 24, LLC v. City of MinneapolisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
- DRB 24, LLC v. City of MinneapolisDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2013