Legal Opinion

Martin v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 19, 1962No. Civ. 6723PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, P. J.

Plaintiffs-respondents Robert S. Martin and wife brought this action for breach of contract and for declaratory relief against defendant, cross-defendant and appellant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, a corporation (hereinafter referred to as “State”) and defendant, cross-complainant and respondent Associates Discount Corporation (hereinafter referred to as “Associates”), alleging generally that on February 12, 1959, plaintiffs purchased and took possession of a 1956 Lincoln automobile; that thereafter, on April 3, 1959, plaintiffs executed a contract of insurance for said…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Parke v. FranciscusCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Fageol Truck & Coach Co. v. Pacific Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Davis v. Phoenix InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Parker v. FunkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Napavale, Inc. v. United National Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1959

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Jefferson Insurance of New York v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Government Employees Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  3. Royal Insurance Company, Limited, a Foreign Corporation v. The Sisters of the Presentation, a California CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
  4. Bohannon v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.California Court of Appeal · 1985
  5. National Fire Insurance v. SolomonWashington Supreme Court · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API