Davis v. Phoenix Insurance
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County. W. L. Pierce, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Searls, C.
This is an action to recover upon a policy-insuring against loss by fire. Plaintiff had judgment for twelve hundred dollars, from which judgment defendant appeals. The cause comes up on the judgment-roll, and is not supported by a statement or bill of exceptions.
It appears from the pleadings and findings that the defendant is, and was at all the times mentioned in the case, a duly organized and acting fire insurance corporation.
That the plaintiff, on the twenty-sixth day of February, 1894, and at all the times mentioned in the complaint, was in the actual, peaceable, and undisturbed…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Van Schoick v. . Niagara Fire Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1877
- Liverpool & London & Globe Insurance v. EndeTexas Supreme Court · 1885
- Herkimer v. . RiceNew York Court of Appeals · 1863
- Riggs v. Commercial Mutual InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Tyler v. Ætna Fire InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1834
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Shade Foods, Inc. v. Innovative Products Sales & Marketing, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2000
- Fraser-Yamor Agency, Inc. v. County of Del NorteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Banerian v. O'MALLEYCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Alexander v. Security-First National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- California Food Service Corp. v. Great American InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.